Uncategorized - SaveParleys.org https://www.saveparleys.org Save Parleys Canyon Sun, 25 Jan 2026 02:39:41 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.7 https://i0.wp.com/www.saveparleys.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/cropped-save-parleys-logo-icon.png?fit=32%2C32&ssl=1 Uncategorized - SaveParleys.org https://www.saveparleys.org 32 32 237577986 The Utah Division of Air Quality is holding a Public Hearing on the proposed Parleys Gravel Pit https://www.saveparleys.org/the-utah-division-of-air-quality-is-holding-a-public-hearing-on-the-proposed-parleys-gravel-pit/ https://www.saveparleys.org/the-utah-division-of-air-quality-is-holding-a-public-hearing-on-the-proposed-parleys-gravel-pit/#respond Sun, 25 Jan 2026 02:00:57 +0000 https://www.saveparleys.org/?p=1688 Wednesday, January 28, 5-7 pm Millcreek City Hall 1330 East Chambers Avenue Millcreek, Utah PLEASE PLAN TO ATTEND! BACKGROUND: On August 8, 2025, Granite Construction submitted a “New Source Review Notice of Intention” (NSR NOI) to the Utah Division of Air Quality for a permit to generate air pollution from what they are now saying […]

The post The Utah Division of Air Quality is holding a Public Hearing on the proposed Parleys Gravel Pit first appeared on SaveParleys.org.

]]>

Wednesday, January 28, 5-7 pm Millcreek City Hall 1330 East Chambers Avenue Millcreek, Utah

PLEASE PLAN TO ATTEND!

BACKGROUND:

On August 8, 2025, Granite Construction submitted a “New Source Review Notice of Intention” (NSR NOI) to the Utah Division of Air Quality for a permit to generate air pollution from what they are now saying will be a 6 acre operation at the proposed I-80 South Quarry in Parleys Canyon.

This unexpected “start over” occurred nearly three years after Granite submitted their original air pollution permit request for a 20 acre quarry.  That application had gone through extensive review, public comment, revision, further review, and, we were told, was on the cusp of being approved by DAQ.  This reset has left everyone who has been monitoring this project scratching their heads.  

In their new permit request Granite changed their proposal in the following ways:

  • reduced the footprint of their initial excavation from 20 acres to 6 acres.
  • reduced the amount of gravel generated per year from 1 million tons to 150,000 tons
  • reduced the number of blasts per year from 12 to 5.
  • reduced the hours of operation of their heavy equipment to the equivalent of 4 months of 8 hour days. 

Additional information to be aware of that has occurred since the project was first proposed:

  • Granite indicated in their initial hearings before the board of the Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining that their long term intention is to develop a 635 acre quarry in Parleys Canyon. 
  • Granite has spent significant funds this winter constructing a frontage road to the proposed quarry site, despite the fact that Salt Lake County has indicated that the 635 acre parcel of property is not eligible for a condition use permit to develop a quarry. 
  • The property owner, Tree Farm LLC, has challenged the County’s determination in Third District Court and recently filed a motion to extend discovery in the case and postpone scheduling the trial until March 7- the day after the legislature adjourns. 
  • HB 355, passed during the last legislative session, prohibits a local government from denying the expansion of an existing gravel pit onto property they already own.  The bill’s sponsor, Rep. Casey Snider, said on the floor of the House that HB 356 was explicitly not intended to create an option for Granite to develop the gravel pit in Parleys Canyon.

This history of the Parleys gravel pit proposal, and these recent changes in the air pollution permit application, taken together raise many important questions that DAQ and other policy makers need to answer before any permits are issued by DAQ to Granite Construction:

Does DAQ have adequate information needed to determine the air quality impacts of Granite’s proposed gravel pit in Parleys Canyon?

  • Does Granite have access to the amount of water required by the Division of Air Quality to suppress the dust that would have be generated by their initial operation plans?  
  • Since DAQ has no monitors east of 7th East that can measure the major air pollutants from a gravel pit (fugitive dust or PM 10), how can they assure the residents of the nearby Canyon Rim, Millcreek and Sugarhouse neighborhoods that the proposed Granite quarry, 2 miles up Parleys Canyon, won’t create unhealthy conditions for their families?  
  • Why does DAQ allow Granite to rely on wind data from the Salt Lake International Airport in modeling the dispersion of air pollutants generated in lower Parleys Canyon?
  • Why hasn’t Granite been required to clarify what months they plan to operate the proposed 6 acre site so that DAQ can determine the air quality impacts during times of the year like this week when Granite’s emissions may push Salt Lake’s air quality even further into unhealthy levels?

Is Granite using gaps in the regulatory process to obscure their plans and incrementally develop a large gravel pit that would not be allowed if they were being transparent about their intentions?

  • Is Granite trying to avoid DAQ scrutiny of the ultimate impact on air quality of their intended large operation by starting with very small one as way of establishing a foothold which would give them the right to expand into a much larger operation?
  • Should Granite be required to reveal their full plans and air pollution estimates for the site before DAQ makes a decision on their air quality permit?
  • Granite’s 6 acre quarry proposal does not appear to be financially feasible. Should DAQ require Granite to submit justification that the current proposal is economically viable before granting them a permit? 

Why is DAQ being asked to issue a permit to an unnecessary project and before the court can rule on its eligibility for a local land use permit? 

  • Shouldn’t DAQ deny the permit in the face of two independent studies commissioned by Salt Lake County and the Utah Legislature, and released by Stantec last year, concluding that there is no need for additional gravel pits to support growth along the Wasatch Front during the next 10-15 years?
  • Shouldn’t DAQ put the application on hold until there is a final ruling on Tree Farm’s court case with Salt Lake County? 

WHAT YOU CAN DO.

  1. Attend the hearing on Wednesday and ask DAQ to postpone their decision on the permit until these and other questions can be answered,
  2. Submit written comments to DAQ at jpersons@utah.gov by Jan 31st outlining the reasons you oppose this proposed gravel pit and asking DAQ to deny the permit.
  3. Share this with family and friends who are concerned about Salt Lake’s air quality and ask them to attend the public hearing with you and submit comments.

The post The Utah Division of Air Quality is holding a Public Hearing on the proposed Parleys Gravel Pit first appeared on SaveParleys.org.

]]>
https://www.saveparleys.org/the-utah-division-of-air-quality-is-holding-a-public-hearing-on-the-proposed-parleys-gravel-pit/feed/ 0 1688
2025 Fall Update https://www.saveparleys.org/fall-update-2025/ Wed, 29 Oct 2025 17:34:54 +0000 https://www.saveparleys.org/?p=1638 Table of Contents Road to Nowhere Court Case Air Quality The Ongoing Fight THE ROAD TO NOWHERE Granite Construction Company appears to have nearly finished grading a frontage road off Exit 132 to provide access to the proposed 635-acre, I-80 South Quarry, two miles up Parleys Canyon.   This despite the fact that almost four years […]

The post 2025 Fall Update first appeared on SaveParleys.org.

]]>

Table of Contents

THE ROAD TO NOWHERE

Granite Construction Company appears to have nearly finished grading a frontage road off Exit 132 to provide access to the proposed 635-acre, I-80 South Quarry, two miles up Parleys Canyon.  

This despite the fact that almost four years after announcing the project, the property owner, Tree Farm LLC, whose principal is Jesse Lassley, is unlikely to secure a conditional use permit from Salt Lake County to proceed with the development of the quarry (see the COURT CASE update below). 

The road is being constructed on Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) right-of-way. UDOT is required to allow property owners along the freeway to develop access to their property.  

The road plan also required a stream alteration permit to enclose a section of Smith’s Creek coming out of Mt Aire Canyon. Granite was authorized to do this by the Utah Division of Water Rights, which also is unable to deny such permits if the applicant meets all of the state’s criteria- even if the road over the stream is unlikely to ever be used!

The before and after photos of the frontage road, shown below reveal all you need to know about what 635 acres (1 square mile) of the Parleys Canyon hillside up to the Millcreek ridge will look like if Granite Construction is allowed to proceed with this project.  

Before
After

AIR QUALITY PERMIT

Dust from the existing quarry in Parleys Canyon

On August 8, 2025, Granite Construction submitted a “New Source Review Notice of Intention” (NSR NOI) to the Utah Division of Air Quality for a permit to generate air pollution at the proposed I-80 South Quarry in Parleys Canyon.

This unexpected “start over” is occurring nearly three years after Granite submitted their original air pollution permit request.  That application had gone through extensive review, public comment, revision, further review, and, we were told, was on the cusp of being approved by DAQ.  This reset has left everyone who has been monitoring this project scratching their heads.  From what we can decipher so far, Granite Construction lowered the estimate of “material throughput” (i.e. the amount of rock excavated, crushed and transported out from the pit each day) and has started the entire air pollution permitting process over again.  

This raises important questions.  

  • Has Granite realized that their initial assumptions about the amount of dust that would blow into the Salt Lake Valley are wrong?  
  • Does Granite lack access to the amount of water required by the Division of AIr Quality to suppress the dust that would have been generated by their initial “throughput” targets?  
  • Granite and Tree Farm have been asserting from the outset that the destruction of lower Parleys Canyon is justified to meet a market demand for sand, gravel and aggregate. But two separate studies last year, that were commissioned by Salt Lake County and the Utah Department of Natural Resources, concluded that there wasn’t an urgent demand for this material.  
  • Does Granite now concede that these studies were correct and that there is not a market for the material this gravel pit would generate?

COURT CASE

In 2022, Tree Farm filed a legal challenge against Salt Lake County, claiming that, because they have “vested mining rights” that supersede the County’s prohibition on new gravel pits in the Wasatch Canyons. the County must issue them a conditional use permit to proceed to develop the proposed I-80 South Quarry in partnership with Granite Construction  

The case is assigned to the Third District Court and the parties are still in the “discovery” phase- exchanging documents related to how each side intends to argue their case. The case is unlikely to be heard before the judge for several months.  And no matter how the court rules, the decision is likely to be appealed to the Utah Supreme Court by whichever party does not prevail.  Therefore, a decision in the case is unlikely to be finalized for at least a couple of years. 

Over the past three legislative sessions, efforts have been made to amend Utah’s mining laws, seemingly aimed at increasing the likelihood that the courts will rule in favor of allowing the Tree Farm/Granite project to move forward. In the most recent legislative session, the sand and gravel industry, local governments, and the legislature hammered out compromise language about the property rights of gravel pit owners that did not create such a loophole for the I-80 South Quarry in Parleys Canyon.  

THE ON GOING FIGHT!

The proposed I-80 South Quarry in Parleys Canyon is NOT a done deal, but it’s also not dead yet.  Save Parleys is working with several non-profit groups who share our concerns.  Together we are actively opposing this project and working to prevent Granite Construction from generating massive amounts of  air pollution, destroying scenic views and wildlife habitat in the Wasatch Mountains, and diverting a huge amount  water from the Great Salt Lake.

Tree Farm and Granite Construction must think that they can outlast and outspend us, and that we will eventually get tired of fighting and give up.  Granite fought the Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians over the proposed “Liberty Quarry” project in California, which the tribe considered sacred land.  It took seven years of opposition by the tribe before Granite backed down.  

Let your city, county and state legislative representatives know that you are keeping a close eye on this issue and ask them to do everything they can to stop it. 

The post 2025 Fall Update first appeared on SaveParleys.org.

]]>
1638
Road To Nowhere https://www.saveparleys.org/road-to-nowhere/ Tue, 02 Sep 2025 14:32:05 +0000 https://www.saveparleys.org/?p=1609 The State is Letting Granite Construction Tear up Parleys Canyon to Construct a “Road to Nowhere” (Salt Lake City, UT) – Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment (UPHE), Save Our Canyons (SOC), Save Parley’s, HEAL Utah and local residents are alarmed that on Monday, Aug. 25, motorists in Parley’s Canyon and residents of the Parley’s […]

The post Road To Nowhere first appeared on SaveParleys.org.

]]>

The State is Letting Granite Construction Tear up Parleys Canyon to Construct a “Road to Nowhere”

(Salt Lake City, UT) – Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment (UPHE), Save Our Canyons (SOC), Save Parley’s, HEAL Utah and local residents are alarmed that on Monday, Aug. 25, motorists in Parley’s Canyon and residents of the Parley’s Mt. Aire community were seeing California-based Granite Construction’s heavy equipment tearing down trees and excavating into the hillside just two miles from the mouth of the canyon to begin constructing a frontage road off Exit 132. 

Multiple state agencies approved this destruction along the lower part of the canyon just to build a property access road for Tree Farm LLC, whose principal is Jesse Lassley, despite the fact that neither he nor Granite Construction have the necessary conditional use permit from Salt Lake County to develop the gravel pit/limestone quarry that has sparked vigorous opposition from tens of thousands of residents of the Salt Lake Valley.

click to view larger picture

Granite Construction and Lassley are making a court challenge to the County’s land use authority that, as it stands, prohibits such a mine in that environmentally sensitive location. There is so much public, city, and county opposition to this mine that any final court decision is almost certain to come from the Utah Supreme Court. Therefore, a final decision in the case is unlikely before at least two years from now.  If the courts rule against Granite and Lassley, this road is nothing less than a hideous, pointless, irreversible scar in the most beautiful part of the canyon wall.

“Granite Construction is tearing into one of Utah’s most iconic gateways without Salt Lake County’s approval for a gravel pit, without certainty and without accountability, this is a road to nowhere,” said Joel Wyner. 

“The Division of Air Quality gets more complaints from the public about gravel pit pollution than any other source. Granite is already despised by most Salt Lake Valley residents for even proposing such a destructive, polluting project in our precious Wasatch Mountains and the eastern gateway to our capitol city.  But for them to start tearing up the canyon for a road that will likely serve no purpose is an arrogant dismissal of the common good of Utah residents, and an exploitation of the state’s incredibly weak environmental laws,” said Dr. Brian Moench, President of Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment.”

Environmental groups and local governments  have been engaged in a heated battle for at least three years over Granite’s attempt to force this mine on the community. But there is still no legislation or state law that would strip the County of the right to prohibit such a mine in this critical mountain watershed.

The damage Granite and Lassley are doing to the aesthetic beauty and the watershed function of the canyon that is a critical water source for Salt Lake Valley residents is irreversible.  It also serves absolutely no function whatsoever, it is a “road to nowhere” if they ultimately lose their court challenge, the most likely outcome.

 Photo credit: Justin Wilde 082525

Contact:

Joel Wyner – Local resident – jdabiker@msn.com, ‭(801) 860-2788‬

Jonny Vasic – Executive Director, UPHE, jvasic@uphe.org, (310-) 24-3151

 

The post Road To Nowhere first appeared on SaveParleys.org.

]]>
1609
Who Opposes this Mine https://www.saveparleys.org/who-opposes-this-mine/ Wed, 10 Jan 2024 21:44:07 +0000 https://www.saveparleys.org/?p=1323 Over 25,000 Utahns.   (Sign the Petition) The Deseret News  Fraser Bullock, President of the Salt Lake City-Utah Committee for the Games The Central Wasatch Commission Mayors of Alta, Brighton, Cottonwood Heights, Millcreek City, Sandy City, Salt Lake City, and the Summit County Commission. Salt Lake County Council & Mayor Millcreek City     

The post Who Opposes this Mine first appeared on SaveParleys.org.

]]>

The post Who Opposes this Mine first appeared on SaveParleys.org.

]]>
1323
Mountair Legacy https://www.saveparleys.org/mountair-legacy/ Tue, 13 Jun 2023 14:43:16 +0000 https://www.saveparleys.org/?p=1232 As visitors traverse up the canyon, they experience the excitement of an escape so close to the valley, unaware of the fragility and history that the canyon holds. The prophets, pioneers, and settlers who would make their mark on the Salt Lake Valley. Temple builders, physicians, business owners, and leaders, who would raise generations of […]

The post Mountair Legacy first appeared on SaveParleys.org.

]]>

As visitors traverse up the canyon, they experience the excitement of an escape so close to the valley, unaware of the fragility and history that the canyon holds. The prophets, pioneers, and settlers who would make their mark on the Salt Lake Valley. Temple builders, physicians, business owners, and leaders, who would raise generations of families. There were hotels, tent rentals, a store, a milk wagon, church meetings, theatre, dances, and legendary hikes. These screened porch cabins built on stilts located high in the tree canopies express the peacefulness and nature of what the families honor. The canyon is a celebration of the late 1800s and early 1900s preserved in a time capsule hidden in Parleys Canyon. For those who take the time to learn its history, it is a place never to be destroyed. 

The post Mountair Legacy first appeared on SaveParleys.org.

]]>
1232
Granite Construction’s history of environmental violations https://www.saveparleys.org/granite-constructions-history-of-environmental-violations/ Thu, 01 Jun 2023 18:53:09 +0000 https://www.saveparleys.org/?p=1206 “It looks like they consider fines to be a cost of doing business and that they prefer to pay the fine rather than to correct the problem.”View Source  We have found reports of Granite Construction violating at least 40 federal and state environmental regulations dating back to 1992. [See references below]  All of these violations […]

The post Granite Construction’s history of environmental violations first appeared on SaveParleys.org.

]]>

“It looks like they consider fines to be a cost of doing business and that they prefer to pay the fine rather than to correct the problem.”
View Source 

We have found reports of Granite Construction violating at least 40 federal and state environmental regulations dating back to 1992. [See references below]  All of these violations resulted in fines that Granite Construction was required to pay to the relevant regulatory authority. The total sum of fines connected to the 40 environmental violations we have found so far is over $1.4 million.  In addition, they’ve engaged in serious financial fraud and multiple workplace safety violations. 
View Source

The specific environmental regulations that Granite Construction violated relate to:

  • Air pollution
  • Failing to control fugitive dust
  • Hazardous waste
  • Operating without a permit
  • Violating air quality standards
  • Violating the Clean Water Act
  • Water pollution [3]
  • Environmental violations 
  1. Washington: 2022 -> $36,000 (air pollution) Washington State Department of Ecology on fined Granite Construction $36,000 for air pollution released from the company’s Moses Lake asphalt plant.
    View Source
  2. SEC: 2022 -> The Securities and Exchange Commission charged the California-based contractor and a former executive with financial reporting fraud. Granite agreed to pay $12 million to settle the SEC’s charges against the company.
    View Source
  3. Granite also paid $129 million to investors to settle a class action suit related to the fraud
  4. EPA: 2018 -> $9,347 for violations of the Clean Air Act (CAA)that occurred during operation of its Hot Mix Asphalt plant located on the Colville Reservation in Okanogan, Washington.
    View Source
  5. Utah: 2017 -> $19,500 (water pollution) During work on U.S. Highway 40, Granite discharged 568,000 gallons of contaminated water into storm drains that led to Silver Creek.  The Utah Department of Environmental Quality fined them $19,500.
    View Source
  6. Illinois: 2017 -> $17,500 (water pollution)
    View Source
  7. California:2015 -> The Ecological Rights Foundation accused Granite Construction Co in a June 2015 lawsuit of failing to maintain controls over stormwater runoff at a Santa Cruz County quarry in violation of the U.S. Clean Water Act and a permit. Granite agreed to a settlement with ERF in May 2016.
    Vew Source
  8. USAO: 2015 -> $8,250,000 (fraud – using a fronting company)
    View Source 
  9. EPA: 2013 -> $735,000 (water pollution) Granite agreed to pay a $735,000 cash penalty and to institute new internal programs to settle serious Clean Water Act violations that occurred at an Oregon highway construction site in 2006. That year, Granite caused sediment to be discharged to multiple water bodies along the construction corridor of Highway 20 for months, without authorization.
    1. View Source
    2. View Source
  10. Alaska/DOJ: 2010 -> $250,000 (clean water act violation)
    View Source
  11. Oregon: 2007 -> $240,000 (water pollution)
    View Source
  12. San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District: 1992-2005 -> In the Central Valley, the company was cited 25 times and fined a total of $25,750 by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, for plants it operates in Kern and Tulare counties. Dating back to 1992, the violations were for failures to contain dust, operate a ventilation system properly and comply with permit conditions.
    View Source
  13. California Department of Toxic Substances Control: 2003 -> $4,000 (hazardous waste violation)
    View Source
  14. Colorado: 2001 -> $11,700 (air quality violation)
    View Source
  15. (NEW) Nevada 2018 -> $2,000 For failure to fully stabilize site soils resulting in plumes of fugitive dust
    View Source
  16. Nevada: 2000 -> $6,785 (most issues: failure to control dust; some for operating without permits)
    View Source
  17. Nevada: 2000 -> $15,400 (most issues: failure to control dust; some for operating without permits)
    View Source
  18. Nevada: 1999 -> $9,670 (most issues: failure to control dust; some for operating without permits)
    View Source
  19. Nevada: 1998 -> $12,000 (most issues:failure to control dust; some for operating without permits)
    View Source
  20. Nevada: 1998 -> $8,000 (most issues: failure to control dust; some for operating without permits)
    View Source
  21. Nevada: 1998 -> $30,000 (most issues: failure to control dust; some for operating without permits)
    View Source
  22. Nevada: 1993 -> $3,500 (most issues: failure to control dust; some for operating without permits)
    View Source
  23.  [Nevada Environmental Commissioner] Mark Doppe, who is in the construction industry, said there are other companies with nearly as many job sites as Granite which have far fewer violations.
    View Source

The post Granite Construction’s history of environmental violations first appeared on SaveParleys.org.

]]>
1206
Submit a comment before July 27th https://www.saveparleys.org/help-our-cause-on-june-22/ Wed, 31 May 2023 03:35:52 +0000 https://www.saveparleys.org/?p=1174 On Saturday May 27, the Division of Air Quality (DAQ) published a notice in the newspaper announcing their intention to issue an Approval Order indicating that Granite Construction’s operational plan for the proposed I-80 South Quarry “meets the requirements of federal air quality regulations and State air quality rules.”    This notice starts the clock on a 60-day public […]

The post Submit a comment before July 27th first appeared on SaveParleys.org.

]]>

On Saturday May 27, the Division of Air Quality (DAQ) published a notice in the newspaper announcing their intention to issue an Approval Order indicating that Granite Construction’s operational plan for the proposed I-80 South Quarry “meets the requirements of federal air quality regulations and State air quality rules.”  

 
This notice starts the clock on a 60-day public comment period which ends July 27
 
DAQ is proceeding despite the following major flaws in their process, their faulty assumptions, and Utah’s weak regulation of dust from open pit mines: 
  1. The approval of an air quality plan for the proposed I-80 South Quarry in Parleys Canyon is premature since the Third District Court has not yet ruled on whether the land is subject to Salt Lake County’s zoning ordinance which would deny the quarry a conditional use permit.
  2. The plan only covers the emission estimates for a 20-acre open pit quarry and Granite has stated in public meetings that their ultimate intent is to expand it to a 635-acre pit.
  3. Nowhere in Granite’s plan does it specify how much water will be required to suppress the fugitive dust.  DAQ does not require operators to estimate the amount of water they will need or demonstrate that they have access to the volume of water required.  This is water that will be diverted from flowing to the Great Salt Lake.  
  4. Utah’s regulation of fugitive dust from gravel pits is extremely weak.

a. DAQ does not routinely inspect quarries and gravel pits for dust control compliance or monitor their dust emissions more often than every 12-18 months.

b. DAQ’s method of assessing dust control can’t be performed at night or under other low light conditions.   

c. Gravel pits and rock quarries are not required to prevent dust plumes from blowing off their property when wind speeds exceed 25 mph.

d. While quarry operators are required to maintain documentation of dust control activities for DAQ review, these records are not available for public inspection and, in any case, do not include information that would allow the public to determine whether the gravel pits are complying with the law.  

 

Take Action

1.  Review DAQ’s 14 page Intent to Approve document for Granite which can be viewed at here and submit comments to John Persons, the DAQ project engineer, at jpersons@utah.gov.   

Comments should be copied to DAQ Division Director, Bryce Bird at bbird@utah.gov; Department of Environmental Quality Executive Director, Kim Shelley at kshelley@utah.gov; and Governor Cox, using this form. 

The post Submit a comment before July 27th first appeared on SaveParleys.org.

]]>
1174
Out Here in the (Parleys Canyon) Pit https://www.saveparleys.org/out-here-in-the-parleys-canyon-pit/ Tue, 05 Apr 2022 18:27:00 +0000 https://www.saveparleys.org/?p=803 Ahead of a critical vote from the Salt Lake County Council this afternoon, Salt Lake Tribune environmental reporter Brian Maffly is getting us all up to speed on the Parley’s Canyon Mine project. Later, Ali mentions these photos from @wasatchsnow. Listen on City Cast Salt Lake

The post Out Here in the (Parleys Canyon) Pit first appeared on SaveParleys.org.

]]>

Ahead of a critical vote from the Salt Lake County Council this afternoon, Salt Lake Tribune environmental reporter Brian Maffly is getting us all up to speed on the Parley’s Canyon Mine project. Later, Ali mentions these photos from @wasatchsnow.

The post Out Here in the (Parleys Canyon) Pit first appeared on SaveParleys.org.

]]>
803
Our Argument https://www.saveparleys.org/our-argument/ Thu, 03 Feb 2022 14:38:50 +0000 https://www.saveparleys.org/?p=595 The I-80 South Quarry website features the following statement from the property owner: As the private property owner for this project in the state of Utah, I want to be a responsible steward of this land while ensuring its highest and best use. That’s why I’ve engaged the best operator for environmental friendliness, Granite Construction, […]

The post Our Argument first appeared on SaveParleys.org.

]]>

The I-80 South Quarry website features the following statement from the property owner:

As the private property owner for this project in the state of Utah, I want to be a responsible steward of this land while ensuring its highest and best use. That’s why I’ve engaged the best operator for environmental friendliness, Granite Construction, to provide a product that we all need as a community. [1]

 

Who is Granite Construction?

Granite Construction is a:

  • $3.5 billion company
  • Headquartered in California
  • Listed on the New York Stock Exchange [2]
 

What does Granite Construction’s track record tell us about its environmental friendliness?

We have found references to Granite Construction violating at least 40 federal and state environmental regulations dating back to 1992. All of these violations resulted in fines that Granite Construction was required to pay to the relevant regulatory authority. The total sum of fines connected to the 40 violations we have found so far is over $1.4 million.

The specific environmental regulations that Granite Construction violated relate to:

  • Air pollution
  • Failing to control fugitive dust
  • Hazardous waste
  • Operating without a permit
  • Violating air quality standards
  • Violating the Clean Water Act
  • Water pollution [3]
 
 

What do Granite Construction’s political contributions in Utah tell us about its regulatory strategy?

Between 2012-2017, Granite Construction regularly contributed to a variety of state officeholders and candidates.

Over the past five years, here are Granite Construction’s political contributions to state officeholders:

2018: none recorded

2019: $20,000 (all to the Critical Infrastructure Materials Coalition)

2020: none recorded

2021: none recorded

2022: $10,000 contributed (split between the Utah Republican Senate Campaign Committee and the Utah House Republican Election Committee) [4]

 

Regarding Granite Construction’s 2019 contribution:

  • The recipient (the Critical Infrastructure Materials Coalition) was formed in order to lobby state political officials on behalf of gravel pit operators. [5] In 2019, the Utah state legislature passed H.B. 288 (Critical Infrastructure Materials), which limits local regulation of gravel pit operations (among other provisions favorable to gravel pit operators). [6]

 

Regarding Granite Construction’s 2022 contribution:

  • The company has (in early 2022) been announced as the operator of the proposed Parleys Canyon gravel pit. [7]
 
 

How can we engage Granite Construction?

Public documents disclose that Granite Construction:

  • Has environmental goals including (i) conserving natural resources and (ii) protecting water, air, land, and wildlife
  • Is focused on meeting or exceeding requirements of applicable environmental laws and regulations
  • Recognizes the importance of engaging with impacted communities on environmental issues [8]

 

Granite Construction is lobbying to excavate a 634-acre gravel pit over the next 100 years in Salt Lake County’s forestry & recreation zones.

 

The purpose of these zones is to protect the natural and scenic resources of our foothill and canyon areas for the benefit of future generations.

 

What Granite Construction is lobbying to do is incompatible with:

  1. The purpose of our foothill and canyon areas
  2. Its own environmental goals

 

If Granite Construction is sincerely committed to conserving natural resources, protecting water, air, land, and wildlife, and meeting or exceeding applicable environmental regulations, then the company should withdraw from participating in this proposed project.

 

Given Granite Construction’s commitment to engaging with impacted communities on environmental issues, please urge the company’s representatives to act in accordance with its own environmental goals by withdrawing from participating in this proposed project:

 

Erin Kuhlman
VP, Marketing & Communication
erin.kuhlman@gcinc.com

Mike Barker
VP, Investor Relations
mike.barker@gcinc.com

Sources

[1] https://www.i80southquarry.com/
[2] https://www.graniteconstruction.com/company
[3] See below:

 

[4] https://disclosures.utah.gov/Search/PublicSearch/FolderDetails/1411814

[5] https://genevarock.com/news/house-bill-288-critical-infrastructure-materials/#:~:text=To%20combat%20future%20issues%20from,check%20and%20allow%20pits%20to

[6] https://le.utah.gov/~2019/bills/static/HB0288.html

[7] https://www.sltrib.com/news/environment/2022/01/29/granite-construction/

[8] https://www.graniteconstruction.com/sites/default/files/inline-files/Keeping_Granite_Green-Environmental_Program_3.pdf

The post Our Argument first appeared on SaveParleys.org.

]]>
595
See Where Our Donation Funds are Going https://www.saveparleys.org/see-where-our-donation-funds-are-going/ Sun, 19 Sep 2021 16:10:28 +0000 http://wp.saveparleys.org/?p=230 Coming Soon

The post See Where Our Donation Funds are Going first appeared on SaveParleys.org.

]]>
Coming Soon

The post See Where Our Donation Funds are Going first appeared on SaveParleys.org.

]]>
230